Predictions of Birmingham hip resurfacing implant offset - In vitro and numerical models

A. Ramos, Marco P. Soares dos Santos and M. Mesnard

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2019, vol. 22, issue 4, 352-363

Abstract: The number of hip resurfacing arthroplasty procedures has declined dramatically in recent years, for reasons related to the survival rate. Some studies suggest that metal particles are the main critical problem, but do not specify the effect of femoral position on the failure rate. The present study aims to analyze whether the positioning of the resurfacing head implant is important in the distribution of bone strains and in the risk of fracture of the femur.Three in vitro experimental models received the Birmingham hip resurfacing implant to replicate the total hip joint. The resurfacing head of the implanted models was placed in three different offset positions: in a positive offset, with the same femoral head center and in a negative offset.The numerical models were validated by correlating numerical and experimental results. Comparing experimental results from the implanted and intact femurs highlights a strain increase of up to 48% in the proximal medial femur region for positive offset and up to 18% in the neutral position. A reduction of 72% for negative offset (valgus position) was also measured experimentally.A significant change in strain distributions was observed with a resurfacing hip system and increased risk of neck fracture was found using the resurfacing head in positive offset. The iliac bone presents a high decrease in strains that will induce bone loss in the long term. Among the offset positions tested, results suggest that the negative offset (valgus position) and the natural position are the best equilibrated for better long-term results.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2018.1556973 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:22:y:2019:i:4:p:352-363

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/gcmb20

DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1556973

Access Statistics for this article

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering is currently edited by Director of Biomaterials John Middleton

More articles in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().