It takes two to tango: Statistical modeling and machine learning
V. Kumar and
Mani Vannan
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 2021, vol. 31, issue 3, 296-317
Abstract:
Statistical methods (SM) have been dominant in generating insights from any type of data for generations. However, with the recent advances in technology, machine learning (ML) has become one of the widely spoken methods to generate insights with more ease of use. While the followers of statistical methods have a differing view point about ML, and the followers of ML have a differing viewpoint about SM, this article isolates the merits of each of these two methods and advances arguments for when to use what method based on the purpose, context, frequency of use, cost, expertise and time. To be specific, the main purpose of SM is for inference and that of ML is prediction. Further, this article goes one step further and creates a scenario where it shows that when we combine the learning from using a statistical method and apply it to machine learning, the ultimate benefit can be greater than the sum of each method’s benefits.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808838 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jgsmks:v:31:y:2021:i:3:p:296-317
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RGAM20
DOI: 10.1080/21639159.2020.1808838
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science is currently edited by Seong-Yeon Park
More articles in Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().