New development: System diplomacy—an alternative to system leadership

Catherine Needham, Nicola Gale and Justin Waring

Public Money & Management, 2025, vol. 45, issue 5, 523-527

Abstract: Senior leaders in public services are increasingly likely to be sent on system leadership training courses. While it is helpful to think systemically, there is a danger that system leadership sets people up to fail in systems that can’t be led. The authors look at the problems of systems leadership approaches and explore stewardship and diplomacy as alternatives. While stewardship assumes that a leader can sit outside the messiness of the system as a benign overseer, the authors explain why they see diplomacy as a more realistic aspiration. A diplomatic lens pays attention to micro-politics and soft power. It does not assume shared values or goals but recognizes the need for collective change strategies of alliance building, bargaining and compromise. System diplomats are able to understand the interests of others, and to articulate ‘what’s in it for me/us’ and ‘what’s in it for them’? These are vital skills in complex public service systems.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2025.2462230 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:523-527

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RPMM20

DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2462230

Access Statistics for this article

Public Money & Management is currently edited by Michaela Lavender

More articles in Public Money & Management from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().