Profilul psihologic al martorului minor

Andrada Nanu
Additional contact information
Andrada Nanu: Ovidius University of Constanta

Ars Aequi, 2018, vol. 8, issue 1, 57-60

Abstract: For an offense to be proven and automatically to punish the perpetrator, it is necessary to study in detail the evidence in the judicial proceedings. The material traces of the offense, ie the objects with which the offense was committed, namely: weapons, stains, fingerprints, etc. constitute the direct evidence of the offense, which in turn is joined by the indirect evidence of the offense, ie the statements given by the acquaintances about the event, objective persons who indirectly participated in the crime, namely the witnesses.

Keywords: minor; psychological profile; witness hearing; probation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://revista.drept-ovidius.ro/index.php/arsaequi/article/view/6 (application/pdf)
https://revista.drept-ovidius.ro/index.php/arsaequi/article/view/6 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tec:aaequi:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:57-60

Access Statistics for this article

Ars Aequi is currently edited by Mihaela Rus

More articles in Ars Aequi from Universul Juridic
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tanase Tasente ().