Floods and financial stability: Scenario-based evidence from below sea level
Ramon Punder,
Cees G. H. Diks,
Roger Laeven and
Dick J. C. van Dijk
Additional contact information
Cees G. H. Diks: University of Amsterdam
Dick J. C. van Dijk: Erasmus University Rotterdam
No 23-084/III, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
Abstract:
When comparing predictive distributions, forecasters are typically not equally interested in all regions of the outcome space. To address the demand for focused fore- cast evaluation, we propose a procedure to transform strictly proper scoring rules into their localized counterparts while preserving strict propriety. This is accomplished by applying the original scoring rule to a censored distribution, acknowledging that censoring emerges as a natural localization device due to its ability to retain precisely all relevant information of the original distribution. Our procedure nests the censored likelihood score as a special case. Among a multitude of others, it also implies a class of censored kernel scores that offers a multivariate alternative to the threshold weighted Continuously Ranked Probability Score (twCRPS), extending its local propriety to more general weight functions than single tail indicators. Within this localized framework, we obtain a generalization of the Neyman Pearson lemma, establishing the censored likelihood ratio test as uniformly most powerful. For other tests of localized equal predictive performance, results of Monte Carlo simulations and empirical applications to risk management, inflation and climate data consistently emphasize the superior power properties of censoring.
Keywords: Density forecast evaluation; Tests for equal predictive ability; Censoring; Likelihood ratio; CRPS. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-ipr
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/23084.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20230084
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().