Platform-Controlled Search and Distortions in Attention Allocation
Xiaoming Cai,
Pieter Gautier and
Ronald Wolthoff
Additional contact information
Xiaoming Cai: Peking University HSBC Business School
Pieter Gautier: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ronald Wolthoff: University of Toronto
No 26-035/VII, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
Abstract:
Digital platforms allocate buyer attention across sellers that differ in quality and breadth of appeal. We study a monopoly platform that sets meeting rates between buyers and two seller types --- niche sellers whose high-quality good is valued by a fraction x of buyers and mass-market sellers whose good is valued by all. Sellers compete by posting prices à la Burdett and Judd (1983), so buyer surplus requires competition, while platform revenue requires seller rents. This difference creates a systematic distortion: as search capacity grows, the platform keeps high-quality niche attention just past the point where extra exposure stops creating rents and starts eroding them — its saturation point — and diverts the rest to mass-market sellers. The resulting buyer-surplus loss converges to a finite limit proportional to the quality gap between the two goods, split equally between an allocative loss from too little high-quality exposure and excess rent extracted by sellers. Applying the model to Amazon product search and Google passage-ranking data indicates that, for captive buyers, both platforms operate past the saturation point, with buyer-surplus losses of 63 and 44 percent of the planner's benchmark, respectively. Allowing buyer participation to respond to the platform's recommendation strategy disciplines the platform and shrinks this loss.
Keywords: Attention allocation; Recommendation systems; Search frictions; Two-sided markets; Enshittification of Internet (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D62 D83 L12 L40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-06-19
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://papers.tinbergen.nl/26035.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260035
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().