EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Principal Evaluation under the Elementary and Secondary Every Student Succeeds Act: A Comprehensive Policy Review

Morgaen Donaldson (), Madeline Mavrogordato (), Shaun M. Dougherty (), Reem Al Ghanem () and Peter Youngs ()
Additional contact information
Morgaen Donaldson: Neag School of Education University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269
Madeline Mavrogordato: College of Education Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824-1034
Shaun M. Dougherty: Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203
Reem Al Ghanem: Department of Educational Leadership University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269
Peter Youngs: Curry School of Education University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA 22904

Education Finance and Policy, 2021, vol. 16, issue 2, 347-361

Abstract: A growing body of research recognizes the critical role of the school principal, demonstrating that school principals’ effects on student outcomes are second only to those of teachers. Yet policy makers have often paid little attention to principals, choosing instead to focus policy reform on teachers. In the last decade, this pattern has shifted somewhat. Federal policies such as Race to the Top (RTTT) and Elementary and Secondary Education Act waivers emphasized principal quality and prompted many states to overhaul principal evaluation as a means to develop principals’ leadership practices and hold them accountable for the performance of their schools. The development and dissemination of principal evaluation policies has proceeded rapidly, however, it is unclear whether focusing on principal evaluation has targeted the most impactful policy lever. In this policy brief, we describe where policy makers have placed their bets in post-RTTT principal evaluation systems and comment on the wisdom of these wagers. We describe the degree to which principal evaluation components, processes, and consequences vary across the fifty states and the District of Columbia, and review evidence on which aspects of principal evaluation policies are most likely to improve principals’ practice and hold them accountable.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00332
Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:347-361

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=1557-3060

Access Statistics for this article

Education Finance and Policy is currently edited by Stephanie Riegg Cellini and Randall Reback

More articles in Education Finance and Policy from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:347-361