 Cold Anticipated Regret versus Hot Experienced Regret: Why Consumers Fail to Regret Unhealthy ConsumptionHaeEun Helen Chun, Joowon Park and Manoj Thomas Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2019, vol. 4, issue 2, 125 - 135 Abstract: The goal of this research is to study why consumers might fail to experience regret after unhealthy consumption. Specifically, we examine how anticipated regret before the unhealthy consumption and experienced regret after the consumption differ. We find that immediate postconsumption regret tends to be less intense than anticipated regret. We additionally find that immediate postconsumption regret tends to be less intense than delayed postconsumption regret. These effects are stronger for people with stronger self-control goals. The results suggest that anticipated and delayed postconsumption regret are “cold” assessments based on the discrepancy between goals and behaviors, whereas immediate postconsumption regret is a “hot” emotional experience. Negative arousal activated by hot regret triggers a defensive response that reduces the intensity of immediate postconsumption regret. Somewhat paradoxically, the results suggest that consumers are likely to be least remorseful immediately after their unhealthy consumption, compared to prior to or long after the consumption. Date: 2019 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/702622 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of the Association for Consumer Research from University of Chicago Press |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.