Defaults in Green Electricity Markets: Preference Match Not Guaranteed

Claus Ghesla

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2017, vol. 4, issue S1, S37 - S84

Abstract: Green electricity defaults should steer individual choices to environmentally friendly alternatives and provide a match with individuals’ preferences for an electricity mix. It is debatable whether green electricity defaults conform to this latter intention. Using two design elements from existing electricity markets, costly opt-out of contracts and green electricity certificates, preferences for an electricity mix are elicited in an incentivized laboratory experiment. This study then assesses whether preferences in the absence of default options match with preferences in the presence of default options. It turns out that the alignment of default intentions and preferences depends on the relative price for green electricity. Green electricity defaults at low price premia, as currently applied in several electricity markets, do not match subjects’ preferences. The findings are relevant for the design of green electricity defaults.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/691977 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/691977 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jaerec:doi:10.1086/691977

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().