Racial Disparities in Wiretap Applications before Federal Judges

Thomas J. Miles

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2012, vol. 41, issue 2, 419 - 458

Abstract: Federal investigators must obtain permission from two authorities before wiretapping suspects: first from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and then from a court. The DOJ imposes a higher standard on the use of wiretaps than courts do, and, as a result, all wiretap applications reaching federal judges are legally sufficient and receive judicial approval. In this setting, prosecutors have no incentive to seek review from favorable judges, and a judge's identity should not correlate with the number of wiretap applications received. The paper tests this prediction using all wiretaps in federal criminal investigations during the years 1997-2007. Consistent with the prediction, judicial characteristics such as ideology and prior professional experience do not influence the number of wiretap applications a judge receives. But African American judges receive substantially fewer wiretap applications, even after numerous judicial and district characteristics are controlled for. The paper investigates several potential explanations for this disparity.

Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/669607 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/669607 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/669607

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().