Optimal Defaults in Consumer Markets

Oren Bar-Gill and Omri Ben-Shahar

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2016, vol. 45, issue S2, S137 - S161

Abstract: The design of default provisions in consumer contracts involves an aspect that does not normally arise in other contexts. Unlike commercial parties, consumers have only limited information about the content of the default rule and how it fits with their preferences. Inefficient default rules may not lead to opt outs when they deal with technical aspects that consumers rarely experience and over which consumers' preferences are defined only crudely. This paper develops a model in which consumers are uninformed about their preferences but can acquire costly information and then choose a contract term that best matches their preferences. The paper explores the optimal design of default rules in such environments and how it differs from the existing conceptions of efficient default rule design.

Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/688406 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/688406 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/688406

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().