Old Chicago against Static Welfare Economics

Malte Dold and Mario J. Rizzo

The Journal of Legal Studies, 2021, vol. 50, issue S2, S179 - S198

Abstract: Although behavioral economists have criticized the empirical accuracy of the neoclassical rationality assumption, they support the normative view that welfare-increasing choice presupposes stable, context-independent preferences. We argue that this position neglects important features of decision-making that were essential to the thinking of Frank H. Knight and James M. Buchanan (Old Chicago economics). Knight and Buchanan embrace the idea that well-integrated preferences are an intellectual construct that cannot be the normative basis for welfare assessments. They argue that the only trait that is stable in real time and across individuals is the urge to have some vaguely defined better preferences. In other words, exploring, learning, and being contradictory and ambivalent are all part of the process both before and after a temporary maximization. We illustrate their view, present some empirical evidence, and discuss the normative implications especially for the character of a liberal social order such as Richard Epstein has advocated.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/704891 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/704891 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/704891

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Legal Studies from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().