Exorbitant Privilege Gained and Lost: Fiscal Implications

Zefeng Chen, Zhengyang Jiang, Hanno Lustig, Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh and Mindy Z. Xiaolan

Journal of Political Economy, 2025, vol. 133, issue 12, 3713 - 3761

Abstract: We study three centuries of fiscal history. Dominant safe asset suppliers issue more debt than future primary surpluses can justify, even after accounting for seigniorage revenue from convenience yields. This pattern holds for the Dutch Republic (seventeenth to eighteenth centuries), the United Kingdom (eighteenth to nineteenth centuries), and the United States (twentieth to twenty-first centuries). When Dutch and UK fiscal fundamentals deteriorated, they lost their dominant position as the safe asset supplier, and their debt became fully backed by primary surpluses. Exorbitant privilege stems from issuing overpriced debt in the early stage, followed by bondholder losses and financial repression in the later stage.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738149 (application/pdf)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/738149 (text/html)
Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

Related works:
Working Paper: Exorbitant Privilege Gained and Lost: Fiscal Implications (2022)
Working Paper: Exorbitant Privilege Gained and Lost: Fiscal Implications (2022)
Working Paper: Exorbitant Privilege Gained and Lost: Fiscal Implications (2022)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/738149

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Political Economy from University of Chicago Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journals Division ().