Overcoming informal trade barriers among Japanese intermediaries: An attitudinal assessment
Kenneth C. Gehrt,
Sherry Lotz,
Soyeon Shim,
Tomoaki Sakano and
Naoto Onzo
Additional contact information
Kenneth C. Gehrt: Marketing Department, College of Business, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192-0069, Postal: Marketing Department, College of Business, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192-0069
Sherry Lotz: P.O. Box 210033, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0033, Postal: P.O. Box 210033, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0033
Soyeon Shim: P.O. Box 210033, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0033, Postal: P.O. Box 210033, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0033
Tomoaki Sakano: School of Commerce, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan 169-8050, Postal: School of Commerce, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan 169-8050
Naoto Onzo: School of Commerce, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan 169-8050, Postal: School of Commerce, Waseda University, 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan 169-8050
Agribusiness, 2005, vol. 21, issue 1, 53-63
Abstract:
Access to foreign markets is increasingly critical to the U.S. as global competition increases. Past efforts by the U.S. to penetrate the Japanese market have often focused on overcoming formal trade barriers including tariffs, quotas, and product standards. Although this form of intervention has enjoyed success, limited effort has been devoted to analyzing informal trade barriers. This study examines informal trade barriers in terms of the attitudes of Japanese distributors toward U.S. products. The study focuses on a product-market for which Japan is the leading single-country importer for the U.S.: fruit. Recent inroads into the Japanese market by other countries have eroded the position of the U.S. This erosion will continue unless U.S. exporters can develop appropriate strategies based on sound market intelligence. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Agribusiness 21: 53-63, 2005.
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/agr.20036 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:agribz:v:21:y:2005:i:1:p:53-63
DOI: 10.1002/agr.20036
Access Statistics for this article
Agribusiness is currently edited by Ronald W. Cotterill
More articles in Agribusiness from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().