Multinomial logit models comparing consumers' and producers' risk perception of specialty meat
E. William Nganje,
Simeon Kaitibie and
Thomas Taban
Additional contact information
E. William Nganje: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, Postal: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Simeon Kaitibie: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, Postal: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Thomas Taban: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, Postal: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Agribusiness, 2005, vol. 21, issue 3, 375-390
Abstract:
There is a dichotomy of risk perception between consumers and processors of specialty meats. Studies show that consumers continue to resist these meats and perceive them as somewhat unsafe while processors perceive them to be safe. This study uses survey data from 401 consumers and 22 bison processors to evaluate the determinants of food safety risk perception gaps. Results indicate that significant food safety risk perception gaps exist between consumers and producers of bison meat. Outrage, among other factors, accounts for consumer risk perception while the number of years in business is a major determinant of producer risk perception. Consumers' food safety risk perception affects the frequency of consumption of bison meat. This creates difficulties in formulating marketing strategies and policy initiatives aimed at moving specialty meats beyond niche markets. [EconLit citations: Q180, D190, C140.] © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Agribusiness 21: 375-390, 2005.
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/agr.20053 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:agribz:v:21:y:2005:i:3:p:375-390
DOI: 10.1002/agr.20053
Access Statistics for this article
Agribusiness is currently edited by Ronald W. Cotterill
More articles in Agribusiness from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().