Are we measuring impact accurately? Identifying potential sources of bias in the evaluation of extension personnel and programs

Andrew Wright, Jeffrey Wright, Dean McCorkle and Jeffrey Hyde

Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 2025, vol. 47, issue 1, 49-64

Abstract: Agricultural extension programs must demonstrate their value to compete for limited government funding. As extension professionals measure the value of their programs, the risk exists that the information they report will provide a biased or an inaccurate measure of value. We examine the evaluation process for extension programs and extension personnel to identify potential sources of bias or inaccuracies. We find that bias and inaccuracy in program evaluation often stems from a focus on short‐term outcomes, rather than long‐term impacts, while bias in personnel evaluation can result from information asymmetries that exist between extension personnel and their evaluators.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13478

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:1:p:49-64

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().