EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Joint-Financing Framework for Water Services in the Thousand Island Lake Water Distribution Project in Eastern China

Di Mao, Manhong Shen and Huiming Xie
Additional contact information
Di Mao: School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P. R. China
Manhong Shen: ��Institute of Ecological Civilization, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311302, P. R. China‡Institute on Rural Vitalization of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311302, P. R. China
Huiming Xie: �School of Business, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, P. R. China¶Donghai Academy, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, P. R. China

Water Economics and Policy (WEP), 2021, vol. 07, issue 04, 1-22

Abstract: Valuing water is difficult and contentious owing to water’s physical, political, and economic characteristics. Combining household-level and county-level data at the county level could clarify the responsibilities of both the government and users. In the Thousand Island Lake Water Distribution Project (TILWDP), the upstream ecosystem services provider, Chunan County, is assumed to sustain a tremendous opportunity cost due to the extremely strict environmental protection requirements of the project. To estimate the opportunity cost of supplying fresh water that meets the standards of the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, a synthetic control model is introduced, and county-level macroeconomic data are used. A funding gap was estimated in the current government-financed situation. Meanwhile, willingness to pay is calculated based on household-level data collected in the downstream area. The estimate indicates that the combination of ecological compensation payments from governments and downstream stakeholders’ willingness to pay for water services could completely cover the upstream service provider’s opportunity cost. Specifically, the related central and downstream governments would need to take on approximately 1/3 of the total cost, while the users from the downstream area would take on the rest. The proposed policies include adopting government–user joint-financing payment for ecosystem services (PES) schemes for regional ecological and environmental cooperation in China, implementing diversified payment vehicles, launching additional environmental education projects, etc.

Keywords: PES; synthetic control method; contingent valuation method; microdata; macrodata (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2382624X21500193
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:07:y:2021:i:04:n:s2382624x21500193

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S2382624X21500193

Access Statistics for this article

Water Economics and Policy (WEP) is currently edited by Ariel Dinar

More articles in Water Economics and Policy (WEP) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:07:y:2021:i:04:n:s2382624x21500193