Interventionist preferences and the welfare state: the case of in-kind aid

Sandro Ambuehl, B. Douglas Bernheim, Tony Q. Fan and Zach Freitas-Groff
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Sandro Ambühl

No 471, ECON - Working Papers from Department of Economics - University of Zurich

Abstract: Why is in-kind aid a prominent feature of welfare systems? We present a lab-in-the-field experiment involving members of the general U.S. population and SNAP recipients. After documenting a widespread desire to limit recipients’ choices, we quantify the relative importance of (i) welfarist motives, (ii) utility or disutility derived from curtailing another’s autonomy, and (iii) absolutist attitudes concerning the appropriate form of aid. Choices primarily reflect the two non-welfarist motives. Because people systematically misperceive recipient preferences, their interventions are more restrictive than they intend. Interventionist preferences and non-welfarist motives are more pronounced among the political right, particularly when recipients are black.

Date: 2025-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/278410/1/econwp471.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Interventionist Preferences and the Welfare State: The Case of In-Kind Aid (2025)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zur:econwp:471

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ECON - Working Papers from Department of Economics - University of Zurich Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Severin Oswald ().