Forecasting the Depression: Harvard versus Yale

Kathryn Dominguez, Ray Fair () and Matthew Shapiro

American Economic Review, 1988, vol. 78, issue 4, 595-612

Abstract: Was the Depression forecastable? After the crash, how long should it have taken contempo rary forecasters to realize how severe the downturn was going to be? These questions are addressed by studying the predictions of the Harv ard Economic Service and Yale's Irving Fisher during 1929 and the ear ly 1930s. The data assembled by the Harvard and Yale forecasters, tog ether with modern historical data, are subjected to statistical analy sis to learn whether their verbal pronouncements were consistent with the data. Both the Harvard and Yale forecasters were systematically too optimistic. Yet, nothing in the data suggests that the optimism w as unwarranted. Copyright 1988 by American Economic Association.

Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (53)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%2819880 ... O%3B2-X&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: Forecasting the Depression: Harvard Versus Yale (1986)
Working Paper: Forecasting the Depression: Harvard Versus Yale (1986)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:78:y:1988:i:4:p:595-612

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().