Bad Beta, Good Beta

John Campbell and Tuomo Vuolteenaho

American Economic Review, 2004, vol. 94, issue 5, 1249-1275

Abstract: This paper explains the size and value "anomalies" in stock returns using an economically motivated two-beta model. We break the beta of a stock with the market portfolio into two components, one reflecting news about the market's future cash flows and one reflecting news about the market's discount rates. Intertemporal asset pricing theory suggests that the former should have a higher price of risk; thus beta, like cholesterol, comes in "bad" and "good" varieties. Empirically, we find that value stocks and small stocks have considerably higher cash-flow betas than growth stocks and large stocks, and this can explain their higher average returns. The poor performance of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) since 1963 is explained by the fact that growth stocks and high-past-beta stocks have predominantly good betas with low risk prices.

Date: 2004
Note: DOI: 10.1257/0002828043052240
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (407)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/0002828043052240 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/data/dec04_data_campbell.zip (application/zip)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/contents/appendices/dec04_app_campbell.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2004)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2003)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2003)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:94:y:2004:i:5:p:1249-1275

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().