Bad Beta, Good Beta

John Campbell and Tuomo Vuolteenaho

Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper explains the size and value "anomalies" in stock returns using an economically motivated two-beta model. We break the beta of a stock with the market portfolio into two components, one reflecting news about the market's future cash flows and one reflecting news about the market's discount rates. Intertemporal asset pricing theory suggests that the former should have a higher price of risk; thus beta, like cholesterol, comes in "had" and "good" varieties. Empirically, we find that value stocks and small stocks have considerably higher cash-flow betas than growth stocks and large stocks, and this can explain their higher average returns. The poor performance of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) since 1963 is explained by the fact that growth stocks and high-past-beta stocks have predominantly good betas with low risk prices.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (379)

Published in American Economic Review

Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3122489/campbellssrn_badbeta.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2004)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2003)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2003)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:faseco:3122489

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard University Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().