Bad Beta, Good Beta
John Campbell () and
No 2016, Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers from Harvard - Institute of Economic Research
This paper explains the size and value “anomalies” in stock returns using an economically motivated two-beta model. We break the CAPMbeta of a stock with the market portfolio into two components, one reflecting news about the market’s future cash flows and one reflecting news about the market’s discount rates. Intertemporal asset pricing theory suggests that the former should have a higher price of risk; thus beta, like cholesterol, comes in “bad” and “good” varieties. Empirically, we find that value stocks and small stocks have considerably higher cash-flow betas than growth stocks and large stocks, and this can explain their higher average returns. The poor performance of the CAPMsince 1963 is explained by the fact that growth stocks and high-past-beta stocks have predominantly good betas with low risk prices.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.economics.harvard.edu/pub/hier/2003/HIER2016.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> http://economics.harvard.edu/pub/hier/2003/HIER2016.pdf [302 Found]--> https://economics.harvard.edu/pub/hier/2003/HIER2016.pdf)
Journal Article: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2004)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2004)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2003)
Working Paper: Bad Beta, Good Beta (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:harver:2016
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers from Harvard - Institute of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Krichel ().