Bridging the Intention-Behavior Gap? The Effect of Plan-Making Prompts on Job Search and Employment
Martin Abel (),
Eliana Carranza and
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2019, vol. 11, issue 2, 284-301
The paper tests the effects of plan making on job search and employment. In a field experiment with unemployed youths, participants who complete a detailed job search plan increase the number of job applications submitted (by 15 percent) but not the time spent searching, consistent with intention-behavior gaps observed at baseline. Job seekers in the plan-making group diversify their search strategy and use more formal search channels. This greater search efficiency and effectiveness translate into more job offers (30 percent) and employment (26 percent). Weekly reminders and peer support sub-treatments do not improve the impacts of plan making.
JEL-codes: C93 D91 J64 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/app.20170566
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: Bridging the intention-behavior gap? The effect of plan-making prompts on job search and employment (2018)
Working Paper: Bridging the intention-behavior gap ? the effect of plan-making prompts on job search and employment (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:284-301
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics is currently edited by Alexandre Mas
More articles in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().