The Gender Gap in Undergraduate Economics Course Persistence and Degree Selection

Laura Ahlstrom and Carlos Asarta

AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2019, vol. 109, 255-60

Abstract: This study examines male and female course persistence and choice of economics degree via a combination of student, instructor, and structural characteristics. We find that students of both genders who declare economics as their major are more likely to take additional economics courses than their non-major peers. Additionally, students' economics grades are a significant determinant of course persistence and degree selection, but men and women respond somewhat differently to their absolute and relative grades. Finally, men's economics degree selection is significantly correlated with their math abilities, while women's economics degree selection is correlated with both their math and verbal aptitudes.

JEL-codes: A22 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
Note: DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20191103
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20191103 (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20191103.ds (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:apandp:v:109:y:2019:p:255-60

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

Access Statistics for this article

AEA Papers and Proceedings is currently edited by William Johnson and Kelly Markel

More articles in AEA Papers and Proceedings from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().