Gender and Competition
Muriel Niederle () and
Lise Vesterlund
Annual Review of Economics, 2011, vol. 3, issue 1, 601-630
Abstract:
Laboratory studies have documented that women often respond less favorably to competition than men. Conditional on performance, men are often more eager to compete, and the performance of men tends to respond more positively to an increase in competition. This means that few women enter and win competitions. We review studies that examine the robustness of these differences as well the factors that may give rise to them. Both laboratory and field studies largely confirm these initial findings, showing that gender differences in competitiveness tend to result from differences in overconfidence and in attitudes toward competition. Gender differences in risk aversion, however, seem to play a smaller and less robust role. We conclude by asking what could and should be done to encourage qualified males and females to compete.
Keywords: experiments; labor economics; economics of education; overconfidence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C9 J16 J2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (348)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125122 (application/pdf)
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:reveco:v:3:y:2011:p:601-630
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.annualreviews.org/action/ecommerce
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Annual Review of Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().