Contract Complexity, Incentives, and the Value of Delegation
Nahum Melumad,
Dilip Mookherjee and
Stefan Reichelstein
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1997, vol. 6, issue 1, 257-289
Abstract:
In settings where the revelation principle applies, delegation arrangements are frequently inferior to centralized decision making, and at best achieve the same level of performance. This paper studies the value of delegation when organizations are constrained by a bound on the number of contingencies in any contract. For a principal‐agent setting with asymmetric information, we compare centralized mechanisms where the principal retains sole responsibility for contracting and coordinating production, with delegation mechanisms where one agent (a manager) is delegated authority to contract with other agents and coordinate production. Relative to centralization, delegation entails a control loss, but allows decisions to be more sensitive to the manager's private information. We identify circumstances under which the flexibility gain outweighs the control loss, so that delegation emerges superior to centralized contracting.
Date: 1997
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1997.00257.x
Related works:
Working Paper: Contract Complexity, Incentives and the Value of Delegation (1996)
Working Paper: Contract Complexity, Incentives and the Value of Delegation (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:6:y:1997:i:1:p:257-289
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... ref=1058-6407&site=1
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Economics & Management Strategy from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().