PRODIGALITY AND MYOPIA—TWO RATIONALES FOR SOCIAL SECURITY*

Pierre Pestieau and Uri Possen

Manchester School, 2008, vol. 76, issue 6, 629-652

Abstract: Among the rationales for social security, there is the fact that some people have to be forced to save. To explain undersaving, rational prodigality and hyperbolic preferences are often cited but treated separably. In this paper we study those two particular behaviors that lead to forced saving within an optimal income tax second‐best setting.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2008.01086.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Prodigality and myopia. Two rationales for social security (2008)
Working Paper: Prodigality and myopia. Two rationales for social security (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:manchs:v:76:y:2008:i:6:p:629-652

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1463-6786

Access Statistics for this article

Manchester School is currently edited by Keith Blackburn

More articles in Manchester School from University of Manchester Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().