EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Choosing the Best Volatility Models: The Model Confidence Set Approach*

Peter Hansen (), Asger Lunde () and James Nason ()

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2003, vol. 65, issue s1, 839-861

Abstract: This paper applies the model confidence set (MCS) procedure of Hansen, Lunde and Nason (2003) to a set of volatility models. An MCS is analogous to the confidence interval of a parameter in the sense that it contains the best forecasting model with a certain probability. The key to the MCS is that it acknowledges the limitations of the information in the data. The empirical exercise is based on 55 volatility models and the MCS includes about a third of these when evaluated by mean square error, whereas the MCS contains only a VGARCH model when mean absolute deviation criterion is used. We conduct a simulation study which shows that the MCS captures the superior models across a range of significance levels. When we benchmark the MCS relative to a Bonferroni bound, the latter delivers inferior performance.

Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (74) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-9049.2003.00086.x

Related works:
Working Paper: Choosing the Best Volatility Models:The Model Confidence Set Approach (2003) Downloads
Working Paper: Choosing the best volatility models: the model confidence set approach (2003) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:obuest:v:65:y:2003:i:s1:p:839-861

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0305-9049

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Christopher Adam, Anindya Banerjee, Christopher Bowdler, David Hendry, Adriaan Kalwij, John Knight and Jonathan Temple

More articles in Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics from Department of Economics, University of Oxford Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2019-08-11
Handle: RePEc:bla:obuest:v:65:y:2003:i:s1:p:839-861