Diversification in the Financial Services Industry: The Effect of the Financial Modernization Act
Neale Faith R. (),
Drake Pamela Peterson () and
Steven Clark ()
Additional contact information
Neale Faith R.: University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Drake Pamela Peterson: James Madison University
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2010, vol. 10, issue 1, 30
Abstract:
The intent of the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 (FSM) was to strengthen the overall financial services sector by allowing financial firms to diversify across industries within the financial sector. Similar to other studies of the reaction to this Act, we observe that investors consider the FSM to be good news. More interestingly, we also observe that systematic risk increased for some types of firms, but decreased for others as barriers were lowered. This finding is consistent with the idea that the reduction of regulation may increase systematic risk, but that the effects of deregulation on risk may be mitigated by anticipated effects of diversification. Specifically, bank holding companies that chose to diversify into other financial industries experienced increases in systematic risk while those that did not diversify realized decreases in systematic risk. Overall, we find that the systematic risk of financial firms converged and increased in the past few years as firms expanded into non-traditional businesses. In addition, we find that the Act reduced systematic risk for some firms, specifically those that diversified their product lines with insurance products.
Keywords: deregulation; Financial Services Modernization Act; Glass-Steagall; Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; financial services industry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2266 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:10:y:2010:i:1:n:16
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/bejeap/html
DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2266
Access Statistics for this article
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy is currently edited by Hendrik Jürges and Sandra Ludwig
More articles in The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().