On the empirical relevance of st. petersburg lotteries
James Cox (),
Vjollca Sadiraj () and
Bodo Vogt ()
Additional contact information
Bodo Vogt: University of Magdeburg
Economics Bulletin, 2009, vol. 29, issue 1, 214-220
Expected value theory has been known for centuries to be subject to critique by St. Petersburg paradox arguments. And there is a traditional rebuttal of the critique that denies the empirical relevance of the paradox because of its apparent dependence on existence of credible offers to pay unbounded sums of money. Neither critique nor rebuttal focus on the question with empirical relevance: Do people make choices in bounded St. Petersburg games that are consistent with expected value theory? This paper reports an experiment that addresses that question.
Keywords: Decision Theory; St. Petersburg Lotteries; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C9 D8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: On the Empirical Relevance of St.Petersburg Lotteries (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00013
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().