Incentives to learn calibration: a gender-dependent impact

Marie-pierre Dargnies () and Guillaume Hollard
Additional contact information
Marie-pierre Dargnies: Paris School of Economics, Université Paris 1

Economics Bulletin, 2009, vol. 29, issue 3, 1820-1828

Abstract: Miscalibration can be defined as the fact that people think that their knowledge is more precise than it actually is. In a typical miscalibration experiment, subjects are asked to provide subjective confidence intervals. A very robust finding is that subjects provide too narrow intervals at the 90% level. As a result a lot less than 90% of correct answers fall inside the 90% intervals provided. As miscalibration is linked with bad results on an experimental financial market (Biais et al., 2005) and entrepreneurial success is positively correlated with good calibration (Regner et al., 2006), it appears interesting to look for a way to cure or at least reduce miscalibration. Previous attempts to remove the miscalibration bias relied on extremely long and tedious procedures. Here, we design an experimental setting that provides several different incentives, in particular strong monetary incentives i.e. that make miscalibration costly. Our main result is that a thirty-minute training session has an effect on men''s calibration but no effect on women''s.

Keywords: miscalibration; overconfidence; incentives; gender effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C9 D8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-07-28
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2009/Volume29/EB-09-V29-I3-P30.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn Calibration: A Gender-Dependent Impact (2009)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn Calibration: A Gender-Dependent Impact (2009)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn Calibration: A Gender-Dependent Impact (2009)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn Calibration: a Gender-Dependent Impact (2008)
Working Paper: Incentives to Learn Calibration: a Gender-Dependent Impact (2008)
Working Paper: Incentives to learn calibration: a gender-dependent impact (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00226

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().