Predicting events with an unidentified time horizon
Patrick de Lamirande () and
Economics Bulletin, 2016, vol. 36, issue 2, 729-735
Economists often employ binary choice models to determine if variables of interest such as asset prices or returns are able to predict the occurrence of significant events, most notably recessions. It is, however, unclear how the results of existing studies should be interpreted due to the common practice of testing the predictability of the event at multiple horizons. Presented with a set of test statistics, some may be tempted to conclude that the variable of interest is able to predict the event if the null hypothesis of non-predictability is rejected at any horizon. This paper demonstrates that this approach results in a significant probability of spuriously concluding that the event of interest is predictable. In light of this possibility, the ability of the term spread to predict US recessions is re-examined with corrected critical values, confirming that the results found in the existing literature are not the result of data-snooping.
Keywords: Spurious regressions; predictability; binary choice models. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-14-00779
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().