EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Unemployment and the 'Labour-Management Conspiracy.'

Larry Karp and Thierry Paul

Economic Journal, 2000, vol. 110, issue 460, 113-35

Abstract: We study a model in which management and a union bargain over a rule that will later determine the level of employment, and over a wage. The government then chooses an output or an employment subsidy. An exogenous natural turnover rate in the unionised sector creates unemployment whenever the union wage exceeds the competitive wage. Government intervention can increase both the equilibrium amount of unemployment and worsen the intersectoral allocation of labour, because of the induced change in the endogenous wage. Unemployment weakens but does not eliminate the possibility of a "labour-management conspiracy".

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Unemployment and the "Labour-Management Conspiracy" (1998) Downloads
Working Paper: Unemployment and the "Labour-Management Conspiracy" (1998) Downloads
Working Paper: Unemployment and the "Labour-Management Conspiracy" (1998)
Working Paper: Unemployment and the 'Labour-Management Conspiracy' (1997) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:110:y:2000:i:460:p:113-35

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:110:y:2000:i:460:p:113-35