Education and selective vouchers
Amedeo Piolatto ()
Economics of Education Review, 2010, vol. 29, issue 6, 993-1004
A widely accepted result in the literature is that the majority of voters are against the introduction of universal vouchers. Chen and West (2000) predict that voters' attitudes towards selective vouchers (SV) may be different. They claim that voters are indifferent between the no-voucher and SV regimes, unless competition leads to a reduction in the education price. I show that, when public schools are congested, the majority of voters are in favour of SV. Furthermore, SV induces a Pareto improvement. In equilibrium, the introduction of SV induces a reduction in income stratification at school, with some relatively poor students attending private schools.
Keywords: Vouchers; Voting; Financing; education; Positive; public; economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: Education and selective vouchers (2010)
Working Paper: Education and selective vouchers (2009)
Working Paper: Publicly provided private goods: education and selective vouchers (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:29:y:2010:i:6:p:993-1004
Access Statistics for this article
Economics of Education Review is currently edited by E. Cohn
More articles in Economics of Education Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().