EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The labor supply of fixed-wage workers: Estimates from a real effort experiment

Jeffrey Carpenter

European Economic Review, 2016, vol. 89, issue C, 85-95

Abstract: Fixed-wage workers comprise the bulk of the labor force and yet little is known about how they respond to changes in their wage. Given recent interest in theories of reciprocity and intrinsic motivation and their implications for effort provision, the neoclassical prediction seems less obvious today. To better understand the motivation of these workers, I estimate their labor supply using a real effort experiment. Two results stand out. First, no one theory seems to fit the pooled data. On average, people work considerably harder than the minimum but they do not respond to changes in the wage. Second, pooling the data is deceptive because there seem to be distinct types with differing responses to the wage. Most workers can be classified as reciprocal or intrinsically motivated and, indeed, these types respond as theory would predict: reciprocators return wage gifts with increased effort and extrinsic incentives crowd out motivation for intrinsic workers.

Keywords: Labor supply; Fixed wage; Reciprocity; Intrinsic motivation; Real effort; Experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 J22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292116300988
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: The Labor Supply of Fixed-Wage Workers: Estimates from a Real Effort Experiment (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:89:y:2016:i:c:p:85-95

DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.05.007

Access Statistics for this article

European Economic Review is currently edited by T.S. Eicher, A. Imrohoroglu, E. Leeper, J. Oechssler and M. Pesendorfer

More articles in European Economic Review from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:89:y:2016:i:c:p:85-95