EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Do beliefs about peers matter for donation matching? Experiments in the field and laboratory

Laura Gee () and Michael J. Schreck

Games and Economic Behavior, 2018, vol. 107, issue C, 282-297

Abstract: A popular fundraising tool is donation matching, where every dollar is matched by a third party. But field experiments find that matching doesn't always increase donations. Individuals may believe that peers will exhaust the matching funds, so their donation isn't pivotal. We develop a theory of how beliefs about peers' donations affect one's likelihood of donation. We test our theory using novel “threshold match” treatments in field and laboratory experiments. One “threshold match” treatment more than doubles the donation rate relative to no match. To understand the mechanism behind this increase, we use a lab study to show that beliefs about peers' donations matter. Our theoretical, lab, and field results combined suggest people are more likely to donate when they believe they are more pivotal to securing matching money. Beliefs about others matter, and they should be taken into account when trying to increase donations.

Keywords: Charitable giving; Field experiment; Beliefs; Public goods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 D64 H41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825617301951
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Beliefs about Peers Matter for Donation Matching? Experiments in the Field and Laboratory (2017) Downloads
Working Paper: Do Beliefs About Peers Matter for Donation Matching? Experiments in the Field and Laboratory (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:107:y:2018:i:c:p:282-297

DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2017.11.002

Access Statistics for this article

Games and Economic Behavior is currently edited by E. Kalai

More articles in Games and Economic Behavior from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:107:y:2018:i:c:p:282-297