Suspiciously timed trade disputes
Paola Conconi,
David DeRemer,
Georg Kirchsteiger,
Lorenzo Trimarchi and
Maurizio Zanardi
Journal of International Economics, 2017, vol. 105, issue C, 57-76
Abstract:
This paper shows that electoral incentives crucially affect the initiation of trade disputes. Focusing on WTO disputes filed by the United States during the 1995–2014 period, we find that U.S. presidents are more likely to initiate a dispute in the year preceding their re-election. Moreover, U.S. trade disputes are more likely to involve industries that are important in swing states. To explain these regularities, we develop a theoretical model in which re-election motives can lead an incumbent politician to file trade disputes to appeal to voters motivated by reciprocity.
Keywords: Trade disputes; Elections; Reciprocity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D63 D72 D78 F13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199616301490
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Suspiciously timed trade disputes (2017)
Working Paper: Suspiciously Timed Trade Disputes (2015) 
Working Paper: Suspiciously Timed Trade Disputes (2015) 
Working Paper: Suspiciously timed trade disputes (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:inecon:v:105:y:2017:i:c:p:57-76
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.12.001
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of International Economics is currently edited by Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier and RodrÃguez-Clare, Andrés
More articles in Journal of International Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().