 How rating mechanisms shape user search, quality inference and engagement in online platforms: Experimental evidenceJournal of Business Research, 2022, vol. 142, issue C, 791-807 Abstract: This paper experimentally tests three rating mechanisms on their ability to reduce the asymmetric information between users on the quality of content they evaluate in online platforms. Using a controlled laboratory environment, exogenously imposed variation in content quality and user preferences allows for the construction of a structural model over user search, inference, selection and engagement in the presence of a given rating mechanism. The results of this study suggest that increasing the granularity of the signals available to users increases their ability to make inferences into the quality of content, which causes improvements in user welfare. The experimental data directly revealed that a five-point likert scale rating mechanism improved user welfare by 10.8% over a single ‘like’ button, and counterfactual analysis from the structural model indirectly revealed it improved welfare by 16.2% over providing no rating mechanism at all. User engagement also increased with the granularity of the rating mechanism, which further aided in the reduction of the asymmetric information. Keywords: Search; Recommender systems; Mechanism design; Voting; Networks; Social networks; Social media; Experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:142:y:2022:i:c:p:791-807 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.029 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Business Research is currently edited by A. G. Woodside More articles in Journal of Business Research from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.