Sanctions that signal: An experiment
Roberto Galbiati,
Karl Schlag and
Joël J. van der Weele
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2013, vol. 94, issue C, 34-51
Abstract:
The introduction of sanctions provides incentives for more pro-social behavior, but may also be a signal that non-cooperation is prevalent. In an experimental minimum-effort coordination game we investigate the effects of the information contained in the choice to sanction. We compare the effect of sanctions that are introduced exogenously by the experimenter to that of sanctions which have been actively chosen by a subject who has superior information about the previous effort of the other players. We find that cooperative subjects perceive actively chosen sanctions as a negative signal which significantly reduces the effect of sanctions.
Keywords: C92; D83; K42; Sanctions; Beliefs; Expressive law; Deterrence; Coordination; Minimum-effort game (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016726811300187X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Sanctions that signal: An experiment (2013) 
Working Paper: Sanctions that signal: An experiment (2013) 
Working Paper: Sanctions that Signal: an Experiment (2011) 
Working Paper: Sanctions that Signal: an Experiment (2010) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:94:y:2013:i:c:p:34-51
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.08.002
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization is currently edited by Houser, D. and Puzzello, D.
More articles in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().