Relative performance evaluation, agent hold-up and firm organization

Ola Kvaløy and Trond Olsen

Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2008, vol. 22, issue 2, 229-241

Abstract: We analyze a situation where common noise makes compensation based on relative performance evaluation (RPE) desirable, but where the agents' ability to hold-up values ex post obstruct the implementation of optimal RPE schemes. The principal can take actions to constrain the agents' hold-up power by limiting their outside options and by protecting property rights, but once these actions are costly, a trade-off between incentive provision and agent control appears. The model contributes to the theory of the firm. It indicates why firms, not agents, own assets, and why peer-dependent incentive systems are more common within than between firms. J. Japanese Int. Economies 22 (2) (2008) 229-241.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889-1583(08)00003-8
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Chapter: Relative Performance Evaluation, Agent Hold-up and Firm Organization (2008)
Working Paper: Relative Performance Evaluation, Agent Hold-Up and Firm Organization (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jjieco:v:22:y:2008:i:2:p:229-241

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Japanese and International Economies is currently edited by Takeo Hoshi

More articles in Journal of the Japanese and International Economies from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().