Selfish-biased conditional cooperation: On the decline of contributions in repeated public goods experiments
Tibor Neugebauer,
Javier Perote,
Ulrich Schmidt and
Malte Loos
Journal of Economic Psychology, 2009, vol. 30, issue 1, 52-60
Abstract:
In the recent literature, several competing hypotheses have been advanced to explain the stylized fact of declining contributions in repeated public goods experiments. We present results of an experiment that has been designed to evaluate these hypotheses. The experiment elicits individual beliefs about the contributions of the partners in the repeated game and involves between-subjects variation on information feedback. The data favor the hypothesis of selfish-biased conditional cooperation as the source for the declining contributions over the competing hypotheses.
Keywords: Experimental; economics; Information; feedback; Belief; formation; Public; goods; Voluntary; contributions; Conditional; cooperation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (129)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-4870(08)00078-0
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
Working Paper: Selfish-biased conditional cooperation: On the decline of contributions in repeated public goods experiments (2007) 
Working Paper: Selfish-biased conditional cooperation: On the decline of contributions in repeated public goods experiments (2005) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:30:y:2009:i:1:p:52-60
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Psychology is currently edited by G. Antonides and D. Read
More articles in Journal of Economic Psychology from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().