Economics at your fingertips  

Cognitive ability and in-group bias: An experimental study

Fabian Paetzel and Rupert Sausgruber

Journal of Public Economics, 2018, vol. 167, issue C, 280-292

Abstract: We study the role of performance differences in a task requiring cognitive effort on in-group bias. We show that the in-group bias is strong in groups consisting of high-performing members, and it is weak in low-performing groups. This holds although high-performing subjects exhibit no in-group bias as members of minimal groups, whereas low-performing subjects strongly do. We also observe instances of low-performing subjects punishing the in-group favoritism of low-performing peers. The same does not occur in high-performing or minimal groups where subjects generally accept that decisions are in-group biased.

Keywords: Cognitive ability; Group identity; Entitlements; Social preferences; Minimal groups; Punishment; Social norms; Social status (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 D31 D63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Cognitive Ability and In-group Bias: An Experimental Study (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: Cognitive Ability and In-group Bias: An Experimental Study (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Public Economics is currently edited by R. Boadway and J. Poterba

More articles in Journal of Public Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().

Page updated 2019-10-11
Handle: RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:167:y:2018:i:c:p:280-292