Cognitive Ability and In-group Bias: An Experimental Study
Fabian Paetzel () and
No 265, Department of Economics Working Paper Series from WU Vienna University of Economics and Business
We study the role of performance differences in a task requiring cognitive effort on in-group bias. We show that the in-group bias is strong in groups consisting of high-performing members, and it is weak in low-performing groups. This holds although high-performing subjects exhibit no in-group bias as members of minimal groups, whereas low-performing subjects strongly do. We also observe instances of low-performing subjects punishing the in-group favoritism of low-performing peers. The same does not occur in high-performing or minimal groups where subjects generally accept that decisions are in-group biased.
Keywords: cognitive ability; group identity; entitlements; social preferences; minimal groups; punishment; social norms; social status (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-neu and nep-soc
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://epub.wu.ac.at/6448/ original version (application/pdf)
Journal Article: Cognitive ability and in-group bias: An experimental study (2018)
Working Paper: Cognitive Ability and In-group Bias: An Experimental Study (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wiw:wus005:6448
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Department of Economics Working Paper Series from WU Vienna University of Economics and Business Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by WU Library ().