EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Nominal GDP targeting for developing countries

Pranjul Bhandari and Jeffrey Frankel

Research in Economics, 2017, vol. 71, issue 3, 491-506

Abstract: Interest in nominal GDP (NGDP) targeting has come in the context of large advanced economies. Developing countries are better suited for it, however, in light of big supply shocks and terms of trade shocks, such as monsoon rains and oil import price shocks in the case of India. Under annual inflation targeting (IT), the full impact of adverse supply shocks is felt as lost real GDP. NGDP targeting automatically accommodates such shocks, while retaining the advantage of anchoring expectations. We derive the condition under which NGDP targeting would dominate other regimes such as annual IT, to achieve objectives of output and price stability. We estimate key parameters for the case of India and conclude that the condition may indeed hold.

Keywords: Central bank; Developing; Emerging markets; GDP; Income; India; Inflation; IT; Monetary policy; Monsoon; Nominal; Shock; Supply; Target; Terms of trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109094431730162X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Nominal GDP Targeting for Developing Countries (2015) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:reecon:v:71:y:2017:i:3:p:491-506

DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2017.06.001

Access Statistics for this article

Research in Economics is currently edited by Federico Etro

More articles in Research in Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:reecon:v:71:y:2017:i:3:p:491-506