Economics at your fingertips  

Research funding and collaboration

Benjamin Davies, Jason Gush, Shaun C. Hendy and Adam Jaffe

Research Policy, 2022, vol. 51, issue 2

Abstract: We analyze whether research funding contests promote co-authorship. Our analysis combines Scopus publication records with data on the Marsden Fund, the premier source of funding for basic research in New Zealand. We use fixed-effect models to analyze within-researcher-pair variation in co-authorship. Among pairs who ever co-authored or co-proposed, co-authorship was 13.8 percentage points more likely in a given year if they had co-proposed during the previous ten years than if they had not. This co-authorship rate was not significantly higher among funded pairs. However, when we increase post-proposal publication lags towards the length of a typical award, we find that funding, rather than participation, promotes co-authorship.

Keywords: Co-authorship; Marsden Fund; Science funding; Scientific collaboration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O31 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Research Funding and Collaboration (2020) Downloads
Working Paper: Research Funding and Collaboration (2020) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2021.104421

Access Statistics for this article

Research Policy is currently edited by M. Bell, B. Martin, W.E. Steinmueller, A. Arora, M. Callon, M. Kenney, S. Kuhlmann, Keun Lee and F. Murray

More articles in Research Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

Page updated 2024-05-17
Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:51:y:2022:i:2:s0048733321002158