Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science

Kevin Boudreau, Eva C. Guinan (), Karim R. Lakhani () and Christoph Riedl
Additional contact information
Eva C. Guinan: Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Karim R. Lakhani: Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163

Management Science, 2016, vol. 62, issue 10, 2765-2783

Abstract: Selecting among alternative projects is a core management task in all innovating organizations. In this paper, we focus on the evaluation of frontier scientific research projects. We argue that the “intellectual distance” between the knowledge embodied in research proposals and an evaluator’s own expertise systematically relates to the evaluations given. To estimate relationships, we designed and executed a grant proposal process at a leading research university in which we randomized the assignment of evaluators and proposals to generate 2,130 evaluator–proposal pairs. We find that evaluators systematically give lower scores to research proposals that are closer to their own areas of expertise and to those that are highly novel. The patterns are consistent with biases associated with boundedly rational evaluation of new ideas. The patterns are inconsistent with intellectual distance simply contributing “noise” or being associated with private interests of evaluators. We discuss implications for policy, managerial intervention, and allocation of resources in the ongoing accumulation of scientific knowledge. This paper was accepted by Lee Fleming, entrepreneurship and innovation .

Keywords: innovation; project selection; bounded rationality; knowledge frontier; novelty; intellectual distance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (131)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:62:y:2016:i:10:p:2765-2783

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().