When Talk Is Not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation
William P. Bottom (),
Kevin Gibson (),
Steven E. Daniels () and
John Murnighan
Additional contact information
William P. Bottom: John M. Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
Kevin Gibson: Department of Philosophy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201
Steven E. Daniels: Western Rural Development Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322
Organization Science, 2002, vol. 13, issue 5, 497-513
Abstract:
Interpersonal relationships can be fragile. The mere perception of opportunistic behavior can lead to a breakdown in cooperation. Once damaged, the question then arises as to whether and how cooperation might be restored. Noncooperative game theory raises serious doubts about the possibilities, although interactional justice and impression management research have shown that verbal explanations can dampen reactions to aversive behavior. Philosophical, anthropological, and ethological research all suggest that genuine forgiveness may require something more tangible and substantive than an explanation. Thus, the current experiment investigated the effects of explanations and varying forms of substantive amends on the restoration of mutual cooperation. The results confirm that rebuilding cooperation is feasible. Apologies and simple explanations can be effective to a degree, though substantive amends have significantly more positive effects than explanations alone. In contrast to prior findings on interactional justice, acknowledgments were more effective than denials in repairing short interactions. This research demonstrates that, once breached, cooperation can be reestablished and that actions as well as explanations and apologies can augment the process in important and sometimes subtle ways.
Keywords: Relationship; Talk; Forgiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (65)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.497.7816 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:497-513
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().