Are Occupations Paid What They are Worth? An Econometric Study of Occupational Wage Inequality and Productivity

Stephan Kampelmann and Francois Rycx

De Economist, 2012, vol. 160, issue 3, 257-287

Abstract: Labour economists typically assume that pay differences between occupations can be explained with variations in productivity. The empirical evidence on the validity of this assumption is surprisingly thin and subject to various potential biases. The authors use matched employer-employee panel data from Belgium for the years 1999–2006 to examine occupational productivity-wage gaps. They find that occupations play distinct roles for remuneration and productivity: while the estimations indicate a significant upward-sloping occupational wage-profile, the hypothesis of a flat productivity-profile cannot be rejected. The corresponding pattern of over- and underpayment stands up to a series of robustness tests. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Keywords: Labour productivity; Wages; Occupations; Production function; Matched employer-employee data; J24; J31; J44 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10645-012-9190-0 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Are occupations paid what they are worth? An econometric study of occupational wage inequality and productivity (2011)
Working Paper: Are Occupations Paid What They Are Worth? An Econometric Study of Occupational Wage Inequality and Productivity (2011)
Working Paper: Are occupations paid what they are worth? An econometric study of occupational wage inequality and productivity (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:decono:v:160:y:2012:i:3:p:257-287

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10645/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10645-012-9190-0

Access Statistics for this article

De Economist is currently edited by Rob Alessie, Bas ter Weel, Casper van Ewijk, Jan C. van Ours and Frank de Jong

More articles in De Economist from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().