Why clashes between internal and external stability goals end in currency crises, 1797–1994
Michael Bordo () and
Open Economies Review, 1996, vol. 7, issue 1, 437-468
We argue that recent currency crises reflect clashes between fundamentals and pegged exchange rates, just as did crises in the past. We reject the view that crises reflect self-fulfilling prophecies that are not closely related to measured fundamentals. Doubts about the timing of a market attack on a currency are less important than the fact that it is bound to happen if a government's policies are inconsistent with pegged exchange rates. We base these conclusions on a review of currency crises in the historical record under metallic monetary regimes and of crises post-World War II under Bretton Woods, and since, in European and Latin American pegged exchange rate regimes. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996
Keywords: fundamentals; self-fulfilling prophecies; currency crises (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Why Clashes Between Internal and External Stability Goals End in Currency Crises, 1797-1994 (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:openec:v:7:y:1996:i:1:p:437-468
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11079/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Open Economies Review is currently edited by G.S. Tavlas
More articles in Open Economies Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().