Rules Versus Home Rule—Local Government Responses to Negative Revenue Shocks

Daniel Shoag, Cody Tuttle and Stan Veuger

National Tax Journal, 2019, vol. 72, issue 3, 543-574

Abstract: Local governments rely heavily on sales tax revenue. We use national bankruptcies of big-box retail chains to study sudden plausibly exogenous decreases in this type of revenue. Treated localities respond by reducing spending on law enforcement and administrative services. We further study how cities with different degrees of autonomy vary in their response. Cities in home rule states, who have greater autonomy, react more swiftly by raising other types of revenue. A regression discontinuity analysis of cities in Illinois, where home rule status is triggered by crossing a population threshold, shows that this effect of local autonomy is causal: home rule leads to smaller revenue drops and stronger bond ratings.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2019.3.03 (text/html)
Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.

Related works:
Working Paper: Rules versus home rule: Local government responses to negative revenue shocks (2019)
Working Paper: Rules versus Home Rule: Local Government Responses to Negative Revenue Shocks (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ntj:journl:v:72:y:2019:i:3:p:543-574

Access Statistics for this article

National Tax Journal is currently edited by Stacy Dickert-Conlin and William M. Gentry

More articles in National Tax Journal from National Tax Association, National Tax Journal Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The University of Chicago Press ().